
Rebecca Reinhard
- was born in 2013
- has a sibling
- speaks Swiss German at home
- likes to draw, climb and read
- is interested in stones and collects them in her free time
- was diagnosed with developmental delay
- at the age of 7, switches to a mainstream school in 1st grade – this was in the 2020/21 school year
- is 10 years old at the time of the interview and will start 4th grade after the 2023 summer holidays
Overview
What do we know about the canton?
Rebecca lives in a small canton. To ensure that the persons remain unidentified, the canton is not named.
What was the timeline of the reintegration?
The chronological sequence of the reintegration is shown.
About the timelineWhat aspects supported the reintegration?
The conditions for success and barriers are described.
About the conditions for success and barriersInformation about the people involved

Annette Reinhard
- is Rebecca’s mother
- manages a medium-sized company
- is married to Rebecca’s father, who works as a social educator, and lives with him

Lucia Berg
- is a trained special education teacher
- implemented the lessons for integrative special education (IS) from 1st to 3rd grade
- has been working in schools for 40 years at the time of reintegration
- has retired in summer 2023

Mauro Pinto
- is the principal of the mainstream school where Rebecca was reintegrated
- worked as a teacher for 8 years
- has been principal for 6 years at the time of reintegration

Ruth Wermelinger
- is a trained kindergarten teacher and special education teacher
- was class teacher in the special education kindergarten at the special school for 2 years
- has 17 years of professional experience as a kindergarten teacher at the time of reintegration, including 13 years in a special education kindergarten

Nina Meier
- was Rebecca’s class teacher in 1st grade at the special school
- is a trained special education teacher
- has 8 years of professional experience in schools at the time of reintegration, including 2 years as a special education teacher
- supported the partial integration into mainstream school

Annabelle Grütter
- is the principal of the special school
- is a trained special education teacher
- has 30 years of professional experience at the time of reintegration
Division of group discussions
Three group discussions took place in summer 2023. The reintegration of Rebecca was discussed:
- Group discussion 01: Mr Pinto and Ms Grütter
- Group discussion 02: Ms Wermelinger and Ms Meier
- Group discussion 03: Rebecca, Ms Reinhard and Ms Berg
Rebecca’s reintegration process
Rebecca visited a forest playgroup.
Her parents were informed that Rebecca’s development is not appropriate for her age.
A hearing impairment was diagnosed. This explained why Rebecca started speaking late and sometimes struggled with pronunciation.
Rebecca then received early years special education measures. This meant a special education teacher supported Rebecca before she started school at home.
Rebecca was assessed by the school psychology service (SPD) before starting school. A mild to moderate cognitive impairment was identified.
Rebecca then attended a special education kindergarten.
«With an IQ of 50, starting in an integrative way was not really discussed. While the SPD already said we could also try integrative education, they did not recommend it. It soon became clear that Rebecca would start at special school, in other words, in separative education.»
In the special education kindergarten, Rebecca repeatedly surprised the teachers and her parents with her skills. She made great strides. It was clear from the outset that reintegration might be possible in the future.
«From the outset, the possibility of reintegration at a later date was there. That was clear right from the start, so it was obvious when Rebecca started school that we had to keep a close eye on this process.»
After one-and-a-half years in special education kindergarten, Rebecca was again assessed by the school psychology service (SPD): Rebecca’s IQ score had risen by more than 10 points.
A further assessment followed in order to examine the developmental delay.
This assessment showed that Rebecca’s level of development and ability was age-appropriate. In other words, she probably had no cognitive impairment after all.
The kindergarten teacher at the special school also backed this assessment. Nevertheless, the teachers and parents were unsure: Is integrative special education (IS) the right path for Rebecca?
«Nobody said that it’s obvious that Rebecca should now go to mainstream school or it’s obvious that Rebecca should stay at the special school. We were all pretty confused.»
The principal of the special school therefore suggested a partial integration.
As a result, Rebecca started 1st grade in partially integrative education: she attended mainstream school from Monday to Wednesday and special school on Thursdays and Fridays.
«At first I was half and half. Half at normal school and half at special school.»
Rebecca had a new teacher and a new class in special school and mainstream school: So two changes at once.

The partially integrative education was planned for six months.
At the outset, it was not clear whether partial integration should eventually lead to reintegration. This was seen positively.
«I really think that partial integration was a great solution. You didn’t have to decide beforehand whether to make this change. Rebecca was still at both places, which meant that the end result was open.»
However, the special education teacher at the mainstream school noticed that the partial integration was very challenging for Rebecca. She then submitted an application for full reintegration before the autumn holidays. This meant that Rebecca was supposed to switch completely to mainstream school.
«And that (the full integration) was definitely the right thing to do, also from Rebecca’s point of view. She was then fully there and no longer torn. […] And if we had seen that it wasn’t right, we would have acted again pretty soon. We would have discussed it further with each other or looked for another solution.»
A meeting was held with everyone involved in October: parents, teachers and principals.
It was decided that Rebecca should be fully reintegrated into 1st grade of mainstream school from 1 December.
«The school year started on 1 August, then Rebecca came on 15 or 16 August. On 22 October, we had a status review, where we said that Rebecca had settled in well, was highly motivated and was able to work on the material in the classroom well with support.»
Partial integration was thus switched to full reintegration after just a few months.
Rebecca received 10 lessons per week for integrative special education (IS) in 1st grade at mainstream school, and 14 lessons per week in 2nd grade.
She also received a further four lessons for integrative teaching (IF).
Rebecca was then assessed again by the SPD in 2nd grade.
Due to her great progress, special school status in German was discontinued from 3rd grade onwards.
In 3rd grade, Rebecca then received nine lessons for integrative special education (IS).
In 4th grade, her special school status was to be discontinued completely. This meant that Rebecca would no longer receive lessons for extra support. She would then only receive support as part of the basic offering. In other words, only in the integrative teaching (IF) lessons, which are intended for the whole class.
Rebecca’s parents, the special education teacher and the principal of the mainstream school did not agree with the assessment of the school psychology service (SPD).
They all agreed that additional support is required to ensure that Rebecca’s reintegration can continue to be successful.
«You could also compare the situation to supporting a blind child. After two years, you can’t simply say that they now […] know the way and don’t need any more help. That they are now a completely normal child.»
However, the request to keep the lessons for integrative special education (IS) was rejected by the canton in June 2023.
Timeline
-
Before starting schools
Early years special education: Rebecca got support.
-
-
Special education kindergarten
Rebecca is enrolled in special school.
-
Special education kindergarten
Preparation for partial integration.
-
-
Mainstream and special school
Implementation of partial integration.
Rebecca receives 10 lessons for integrative special education (IS) per week.
-
-
Mainstream school
Implementation of full reintegration.
Rebecca receives 10 lessons for integrative special education (IS) per week.
-
Mainstream school
Continuation of reintegration.
Rebecca receives 14 lessons per week of support, including 6 lessons for integrative special education (IS).
-
-
Mainstream school
Continuation of reintegration.
Rebecca receives 9 lessons per week of support, but no longer any lessons for integrative special education (IS) in German.
-
-
Mainstream school
Continuation of reintegration.
Rebecca’s special school status is discontinued and she no longer receives support.
Conditions for success and barriers
Conditions for success and barriers were identified in the discussions about Rebecca’s reintegration. These are divided into five topics.
Process structure
This section describes how the reintegration process can be supported.
Conditions for success
What aspects supported the reintegration?
- The partial integration was implemented openly, without pressure and specifically for Rebecca.
- The leeway in cantonal concepts helped to tailor the process individually.
- A small canton has shorter lines of communication. This allowed the process to be tailored to Rebecca’s needs.
- The comprehensive taster week at mainstream school gave Rebecca and those involved an in-depth insight.
- The timing at the start of school in 1st grade.
Barriers
What aspects made reintegration difficult?
- Reintegration processes are not thought about in the long term. Every year, support for Rebecca must be applied for again. This is very complex.
- If there are several transitions at the same time, this is challenging. Rebecca had to master two transitions at the same time in 1st grade: one in special school and one in mainstream school.
General conditions
This section describes what is needed at school to support reintegration.
Conditions for success
What aspects supported the reintegration?
- Human resources are important in order to prepare well for the reintegration process, e.g. a visit to the new mainstream school.
- The high number of lessons for integrative special education (IS).
- The municipality was able to allocate additional resources flexibly from the basic offering.
- A reintegration class with a small number of students.
- More support from the special education teacher, as another child in the same class also had lessons for integrative special education.
- An experienced, trained special education teacher and a trained entry-level teacher were the ideal combination.
Barriers
What aspects made reintegration difficult?
- Resources for integrative special education (IS) are only allocated at short notice.
- The composition of the class can make social integration more difficult. e.g. the class is already divided into groups when Rebecca joined.
- The financing of integrative special education (IS) must be borne by all levels: class – school – municipality – canton. If one level does not participate, things are difficult.
Family resources
This section describes the extent to which the family can support reintegration.
Conditions for success
What aspects supported the reintegration?
- The financial resources of the family allowed Rebecca to receive support.
- The desire and support of the parents were helpful.
- Rebecca’s technical skills were helpful. This was mentioned by the kindergarten teacher in special school.
- Rebecca’s will and perseverance supportet her reintegration.
- Rebecca’s resources were supported by a tailored timetable. For example, she had some afternoons off at the beginning of reintegration to take the pressure off her.
Barriers
What aspects made reintegration difficult?
- Rebecca put a lot of pressure on herself or showed inhibitions. This barrier was suspected by the special education teachers at the special school, but was not confirmed.
Cooperation
This section describes how cooperation can support reintegration.
Conditions for success
What aspects supported the reintegration?
- The special school and mainstream school jointly shape the reintegration process.
- Networking and exchange between teachers at special and mainstream school were important. For example, dealing with Rebecca in class was discussed.
- Regular, open dialogue was important in order to cultivate the relationship between the mainstream school and parents.
- The willingness of the parents to cooperate.
- The mutual trust of all parties involved: everyone wants the best for Rebecca.
- The school management of the mainstream school was in close contact with the teachers responsible for reintegrating Rebecca. They looked for solutions together.
Barriers
What aspects made reintegration difficult?
- The special education teacher was unable to apply her specialist expertise in integrative teaching in the mainstream school, as working with the class teacher was difficult.
- Organisational challenges in implementing the partial integration: the responsibilities between mainstream school and special school need to be clarified.
- The influential position of the school psychology service (SPD) on the future of Rebecca. The special education teacher, the principal of the mainstream school and Rebecca’s parents feel at its mercy, which is challenging.
Attitude
This section describes how attitudes and subsequent actions can support reintegration.
Conditions for success
What aspects supported the reintegration?
- Everyone involved backed the integrative approach.
- The optimistic attitude of the teachers.
- The commitment and dedication of the people involved towards Rebecca’s reintegration was considerable.
- Everyone supported the goal of implementing Rebecca’s reintegration.
Barriers
What aspects made reintegration difficult?
- The special education teachers at the special school suspected that the pupils at mainstream schools were less open towards children with special educational needs.